Patch Tuesday is back, and this month, it is an absolute mammoth. If you have been putting off those system updates, now is the time to take action.

Microsoft has just rolled out software updates to fix a staggering 167 security vulnerabilities across its Windows operating systems and related software.

This marks the second-largest Patch Tuesday in the company's history.

But Microsoft is not the only tech giant patching critical holes this month. We are also tracking emergency zero-day updates for Google Chrome and Adobe Reader.

Let us dive into the key vulnerabilities you need to know about and how to secure your network today.

April 2026 - Microsoft Security Update Guide

Critical Microsoft Updates: SharePoint and BlueHammer

With 167 fixes, Microsoft's April 2026 release is massive. It includes nearly 60 browser vulnerabilities alone. According to Adam Barnett, lead software engineer at Rapid7, this sets a new record in that category. Barnett notes that it might be tempting to tie this sudden spike to the recent buzz around Project Glasswing—a highly anticipated, unreleased AI capability from Anthropic that reportedly excels at finding bugs. However, since Microsoft Edge is based on Chromium, the Chromium maintainers are acknowledging a wide range of researchers for these vulnerabilities. Still, Barnett safely concludes that this increase in volume is driven by ever-expanding AI capabilities, and we should expect vulnerability reporting to keep growing as AI models become more capable.

Among these numerous updates, two critical Microsoft flaws demand your immediate attention:

The SharePoint Server Zero-Day (CVE-2026-32201) https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-32201)

Microsoft is warning users that attackers are already actively targeting CVE-2026-32201 (https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-32201), a vulnerability within Microsoft SharePoint Server. This flaw allows malicious actors to spoof trusted content or interfaces over a network.

Mike Walters, president and co-founder of Action1, explains that this vulnerability can be used to deceive employees, partners, or customers by presenting falsified information right inside trusted SharePoint environments. Walters points out that this can enable phishing attacks, unauthorized data manipulation, or social engineering campaigns that lead to further compromise. Because there is active exploitation, organizational risk is significantly increased. If your organization relies on SharePoint, applying this update is critical.

Windows Defender's BlueHammer Bug (CVE-2026-33825)  (https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33825)

Microsoft also addressed a privilege escalation vulnerability in Windows Defender dubbed "BlueHammer," officially tracked as CVE-2026-33825 (https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-33825). Exploit code for this bug was recently published online by a security researcher who grew frustrated with Microsoft's response time. Fortunately, Will Dormann, senior principal vulnerability analyst at Tharros, confirmed that the public BlueHammer exploit code no longer works after installing today's patches.

Major Fixes for Adobe Reader and Google Chrome

Microsoft was not the only company busy patching vulnerabilities this month. Whether you are viewing PDFs or just browsing the web, you need to ensure your third-party applications are up to date.

Adobe Reader Emergency Update (CVE-2026-34621) (https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34621)

Adobe released an emergency update on April 11 to fix an actively exploited flaw that could lead to remote code execution. Satnam Narang, senior staff research engineer at Tenable, noted that there are indications this specific zero-day vulnerability, CVE-2026-34621 (https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34621), has been seeing active exploitation in the wild since at least November 2025. If you use Adobe Reader, ensure the software is updated immediately to close this dangerous backdoor.

Google Chrome's Fourth Zero-Day of 2026 (CVE-2026-5281) https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-5281)

Finally, no matter what browser you use to surf the web, it is vital to completely close out and restart it periodically. It is easy to put off—especially if you have dozens of tabs open—but restarting is the only way to ensure updates actually install. For instance, a Google Chrome update released earlier this month fixed 21 security holes, including a high-severity zero-day flaw tracked as CVE-2026-5281 (https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-5281).

*This marked Chrome's fourth zero-day patch of 2026.

This month's record-breaking patch load is a stark reminder of how quickly the cybersecurity landscape is evolving. With AI making it easier to discover software vulnerabilities, we can expect these massive update cycles to become the new normal.

Your next steps are simple: apply your Windows updates, check Adobe Reader for pending patches, and completely restart your web browsers.

Did you enjoy CarlsCloud™ today and did I help you at all?

If so, buy me a coffee or just shoot me a note via LinkedIn to say thanks it would mean a lot!

It is that time yet again...  Happy Patching!

The March 2026 security update bonanza from Microsoft has arrived, and while we are spared from the high-pressure "zero-day" madness seen in February, there is plenty here that demands immediate attention.

This month, Microsoft addressed 84 security vulnerabilities across its ecosystem, including two publicly disclosed flaws and several critical issues affecting productivity tools like Office and SQL Server.

Whether you are a system administrator or a security-conscious user, this update highlights a significant shift in the threat landscape—specifically the rise of AI in vulnerability discovery.

Summary of March 2026 vulnerabilities at SANS

Microsoft Patch Tuesday March 2026 - SANS Internet Storm Center

Microsoft Patch Tuesday March 2026, Author: Johannes Ullrich

SANS Internet Storm Center

The Headlines: 84 Flaws and AI Discovery

Of the 84 CVEs patched this month, eight are rated as Critical and 76 as Important. The breakdown of vulnerability types is heavily weighted toward privilege escalation:

Elevation of Privilege: 46 vulnerabilities (55% of the total)

Remote Code Execution (RCE): 18 vulnerabilities

Information Disclosure: 10 vulnerabilities

Denial of Service: 4 vulnerabilities

Notably, this month features CVE-2026-21536, a critical RCE bug in the Microsoft Devices Pricing Program. While Microsoft has already mitigated this on the backend (requiring no user action), it is historically significant as one of the first vulnerabilities identified by an autonomous AI penetration testing agent (XBOW).

Critical Vulnerabilities to Prioritize

Microsoft Office & Excel

As is often the case, the most immediate risk to end-users lies in Microsoft Office. Two critical Remote Code Execution vulnerabilities, CVE-2026-26110 and CVE-2026-26113, can be triggered simply by viewing a malicious email or file in the Preview Pane.

Additionally, CVE-2026-26144 is a critical information disclosure flaw in Excel. In a corporate environment where Excel files often house sensitive financial data, this cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability could allow attackers to exfiltrate data silently.

SQL Server Elevation of Privilege

CVE-2026-21262 is a publicly disclosed flaw that allows an authorized attacker to elevate their privileges to sysadmin over a network. While it requires low-level privileges to start, the leap to sysadmin makes this a top priority for any organization running SQL Server 2016 or later.

Key Takeaway: Even without active "in-the-wild" exploitation reported yet, the public disclosure of these flaws means the "clock is ticking" for defenders to apply patches before exploit code becomes widely available.

Publicly Disclosed Zero-Days

Two vulnerabilities were known to the public before a patch was available this month:

CVE-2026-21262: The SQL Server elevation flaw mentioned above.

CVE-2026-26127: A Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability affecting applications running on .NET 9.0 and 10.0.

Official Microsoft Resources & Downloads

To secure your environment, refer to the official documentation and update catalogs provided by Microsoft:

Official Summary: Microsoft Security Update Guide (March 2026)

Windows 11 Hotpatch: KB5079420 Release Notes

SQL Server Update: KB5077465 (SQL Server 2022)

Office 2016 Update: KB5002838 Security Update

While the lack of exploited zero-days is a welcome relief compared to last month, the high volume of privilege escalation bugs and the "Preview Pane" risks in Office mean that "business as usual" patching isn't enough. Organizations should prioritize their SQL Server and Office deployments immediately.

Are your systems up to date?

Check your Windows Update settings or your WSUS/Intune consoles to ensure these critical fixes are being deployed.

Did you enjoy CarlsCloud™ today and did I help you at all?

If so, buy me a coffee or just shoot me a note via LinkedIn to say thanks it would mean a lot!

For the better part of a decade, the contract between business owners and Google was simple: you provide the content, they provide the traffic.  That contract has been quietly rewritten.

Access the Synapse v2 Beta

If you are a digital entrepreneur or an SEO strategist, you have likely noticed a disturbing trend in your Q1 analytics. Your rankings haven't dropped—you might still be holding the #1 or #2 organic position—but your click-through rate (CTR) is bleeding out.

This is the economic reality of the AI Overview (AIO). We have entered an era where "search" is being replaced by "synthesis." For businesses relying on organic traffic, the goalpost has moved from "visibility" to "citation."

The Pivot: From Keywords to "Information Gain"

The traditional SEO playbook—keyword density, backlink velocity, and technical hygiene—is no longer sufficient to secure the top spot in a generative AI world. Large Language Models (LLMs) like Gemini don't just match strings of text; they assess Semantic Density.

The algorithm is prioritizing Information Gain. It is looking for content that adds specific value—unique entities, data points, or relationships—that isn't found elsewhere. If your content is just a polished version of what everyone else is saying, the AI summarizes it, serves the answer to the user, and you get zero clicks.

To survive, you cannot just be relevant; you must be the primary source the AI is forced to cite.

Reverse-Engineering the Black Box

Recognizing this shift, the team at CloudNerve.com has developed a tool specifically for this new landscape: Synapse.

This isn't a standard SEO audit tool. It is an engine designed to reverse-engineer the "why" behind the AI's choices. It helps business owners move from guessing to data-driven execution.

The Synapse Strategy:

Gap Analysis over Keyword Research

Synapse compares your content (the "Challenger") against the AI Overview (the "Winner") to identify the "dark matter"—the specific entities and concepts the AI values that your content is missing.

Automated Semantic Density

Using Gemini 2.0 Flash, the tool’s "Semantic Rewrite Engine" doesn't just suggest changes; it generates high-density, fact-rich content blocks designed to plug these gaps instantly.

Visualizing the Deficit

A side-by-side visual diff allows you to see exactly where your content lacks the depth required to trigger an AI citation.

The Beta Opportunity

For entrepreneurs and agencies looking to future-proof their traffic sources, Synapse is currently in open Beta. This is an opportunity to stress-test your current high-value pages against the new reality of AI Search.

The Synapse platform offers 3 Free Credits to new accounts to test this AI SERP Agent engine today with no obligation.

You can continue optimizing for the internet of 2015, or you can start optimizing for the machine that is currently reading the world.

Access the Synapse v2 Beta

Synapse v2 Beta - UPDATE: MCP Developer API Keys Now Available!

In a significant blow to the global ransomware ecosystem, US law enforcement has successfully seized the domains of RAMP, a notorious cybercrime forum. Known as the Russian Anonymous Marketplace, RAMP served as a critical hub for ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) gangs, initial access brokers, and extortionists. This takedown disrupts a major communication channel for digital criminals and marks another victory for federal authorities in the ongoing battle against organized cybercrime.

The Seizure Operation

Visitors to the RAMP dark web and clearnet domains are now greeted with a stark seizure notice. The banner attributes the operation to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), in coordination with the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida and the Department of Justice's Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section.

In a move that has become characteristic of recent law enforcement operations, the seizure page includes a bit of trolling aimed at the site's operators. The feds replaced the forum's content with a banner declaring it "The Only Place Ransomware Allowed!" accompanied by an image of Masha—a character from the popular Russian animated series Masha and the Bear—winking at the viewer. While the FBI has not officially commented on the specifics of the operation, DNS records confirm that the domains are now in the custody of federal authorities.

The Administrator's Response

The takedown has been confirmed by one of the forum's alleged operators, who uses the handle "Stallman." In a post on the XSS hacking forum, which has circulated widely on social media, Stallman acknowledged the loss of the platform.

"This event destroyed years of my work to create the most free forum in the world, and although I hoped this day would never come, deep down I always understood that it was possible," Stallman wrote. "This is the risk we all take."

Unlike some cybercriminals who immediately vow to rebuild, Stallman indicated a shift in operations. He stated that he would not attempt to create a new forum but would instead continue his core business of buying network access.

What Was RAMP?

RAMP was more than just a discussion board; it was a specialized marketplace catering to the elite of the cybercriminal underworld. It provided a venue for:

• Ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) gangs to recruit affiliates.
• Initial access brokers to sell entry points into compromised corporate networks.
• Extortionists to coordinate attacks and share tactics.

By removing this platform, law enforcement has forced these actors to scramble for alternative venues, disrupting their operations and sowing distrust within the community.

The seizure of RAMP serves as a powerful reminder of the reach of US law enforcement, even into the darkest corners of the web. While the forum's administrator claims his "core business remains unchanged," the destruction of the platform represents a significant loss of infrastructure and trust for the ransomware community. As authorities continue to dismantle these digital marketplaces, cybercriminals are finding fewer safe havens to conduct their illicit business.

Other Related Article Resources:

Site catering to online criminals has been seized by the FBI

One of the last holdouts for ransomware discussions, RAMP is taken down.

Ars TechnicaDan Goodin

FBI seizes RAMP cybercrime forum used by ransomware gangs

The FBI has seized the notorious RAMP cybercrime forum, a platform used to advertise a wide range of malware and hacking services, and one of the few remaining forums that openly allowed the promotion of ransomware operations.

BleepingComputerLawrence Abrams

A new and aggressive botnet known as Kimwolf has rapidly infected over two million devices globally, exposing a critical vulnerability in how internal networks—from home offices to corporate and government environments—are secured.

The Threat Landscape

Security researchers from Synthient and the Chinese firm XLab have tracked the explosive growth of Kimwolf, which primarily targets unofficial Android TV streaming boxes and internet-connected digital photo frames. These low-cost devices, often sold on major e-commerce platforms like Amazon and Walmart, frequently ship with no built-in security or authentication.

While the sheer size of the botnet (estimated at 1.8 to 2 million infected devices) is alarming, the primary concern is its ability to bypass traditional perimeter defenses.

Infoblox reviewed its customer traffic and found 25% made queries to Kimwolf related domain names since Oct. 1st , 2025.

“To be clear, this suggests that nearly 25% of customers had at least one device that was an endpoint in a residential proxy service targeted by Kimwolf operators,” Infoblox explained. “Such a device, maybe a phone or a laptop, was essentially co-opted by the threat actor to probe the local network for vulnerable devices. A query means a scan was made, not that new devices were compromised. Lateral movement would fail if there were no vulnerable devices to be found or if the DNS resolution was blocked.”

Mechanism of Attack: Tunneling Through Proxies

Kimwolf utilizes a sophisticated method to breach local networks:

Residential Proxy Abuse: The botnet leverages "residential proxy" services—networks that allow users to route traffic through legitimate residential IP addresses to anonymize their location.

RFC-1918 Bypass: Researchers discovered that Kimwolf operators could manipulate Domain Name System (DNS) settings to target internal IP ranges (such as 192.168.x.x or 10.x.x.x). This allows attackers to "tunnel" back through a proxy user's connection and communicate directly with other devices on that user's local network.

ADB Exploitation: Many infected Android devices ship with the Android Debug Bridge (ADB) enabled by default. This diagnostic tool, intended for manufacturing, leaves the device listening for unauthenticated commands. Attackers can simply connect to port 5555 and gain "super user" administrative access instantly.

Government and Corporate Implications

The threat extends beyond consumer living rooms. The ability to tunnel into local networks makes Kimwolf a potent tool for reconnaissance and lateral movement within enterprise and government environments.

Recent reports indicate that federal agencies, including the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), are investigating incidents where hackers may have used similar proxy-tunneling techniques to gain unauthorized access to agency portals and law enforcement databases. This suggests that "smart" devices connected to guest or corporate networks could serve as trojan horses, bypassing firewalls to expose sensitive internal infrastructure.

Key Findings and Attribution

• Origin: The botnet is believed to be an evolution of the earlier Aisuru botnet, with code analysis revealing shared infrastructure and specific "easter eggs" referencing security researchers.
• Infrastructure: The botnet relies heavily on the IPIDEA proxy network. Investigations revealed a near-perfect overlap between new Kimwolf infections and IP addresses sold by IPIDEA.
• Monetization: Infected devices are monetized in multiple ways, including participation in massive Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, ad fraud, and mass content scraping.

Mitigation Recommendations

Security experts advise the following immediate steps:

Device Audit: Identify and remove unsanctioned "grey market" Android TV boxes or cheap IoT devices from the network.

Network Segmentation: Strictly isolate IoT devices on a separate VLAN (Virtual Local Area Network) that cannot communicate with critical computers, servers, or sensitive data repositories.

Disable ADB: If such devices must be used, ensure developer options and ADB are disabled.

Proxy Blocking: Enterprise firewalls should block connections to known residential proxy services and restrict DNS resolution for internal IP ranges from external sources.

Additional Resources:

XLab Technical Report: "Kimwolf Exposed

This is the primary technical source mentioned in the rewritten article. It details the botnet's command-and-control infrastructure, the specific "easter eggs" found in the code, and the methodology used to estimate the 1.8+ million infection count.

Quokka Security Advisory: Uhale Digital Picture FramesLink

This report focuses specifically on the "digital photo frame" infection vector. It explains the vulnerabilities in the Uhale app and Android-based frames that allow Kimwolf to gain root access and persist on the network.

KrebsOnSecurity: Part II – Who Benefited from the Aisuru and Kimwolf Botnets?

The follow-up investigation teased in the original article. This piece dives into the financial ecosystem behind the botnet, linking the operators to specific residential proxy providers like IPIDEA and analyzing the "follow the money" trail.

Welcome to the first Patch Tuesday of 2026.

If you were hoping for a quiet start to the new year, Microsoft had other plans.

This month, Redmond has released a substantial security update addressing 114 vulnerabilities across its ecosystem. The release is heavy on critical risks, patching 12 Critical flaws and, most importantly, 3 zero-day vulnerabilities—one of which is already being actively exploited in the wild.

For system administrators and security teams, the holiday break is officially over. Here is everything you need to know to secure your environment this month.

The January 2026 Breakdown

The volume of patches this month is significantly higher than recent averages, signaling a busy year ahead for patch management.

• Total Vulnerabilities Fixed: 114
• Critical Vulnerabilities: 12
• Zero-Days: 3 (Includes actively exploited flaws)
• Remote Code Execution (RCE): 22

The updates cover a wide range of products, including Windows, Office, SharePoint, .NET, and SQL Server. However, the most urgent attention should be directed toward the Windows Kernel, LSASS, and Office components.

Priority 1: The Zero-Day Threats

This month's most pressing issues are the zero-day vulnerabilities. These are flaws that were either publicly disclosed or exploited before a patch was available.

Actively Exploited Agere Modem Driver

Microsoft has patched an Elevation of Privilege (EoP) vulnerability in the built-in Agere modem drivers. While modem drivers might feel like legacy tech, they remain a viable attack vector in legacy codebases.

• Risk: Attackers can abuse this to gain higher privileges on a compromised machine.
• Action: Verify the installation of KB5073724 immediately.

2. WinSqlite DLL Security Flaw

A second zero-day involves the third-party WinSqlite DLL, a core component used by Windows for database operations. This flaw has been publicly disclosed, increasing the risk that threat actors will reverse-engineer the vulnerability to create exploits.

Critical Remote Code Execution (RCE) Risks

Beyond the zero-days, massive RCE risks lurk in this update. If left unpatched, these could allow attackers to run arbitrary code on your network.

LSASS RCE (CVE-2026-20854)

The Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) is a favorite target for attackers (often used to dump credentials).

• The Flaw: A use-after-free error that allows remote code execution over the network.
• Severity: Critical. This affects the core authentication mechanism of Windows.

Microsoft Office & Excel RCEsThe Office suite received multiple critical patches this month, specifically targeting:

• Excel: Multiple pointer issues and integer underflows (e.g., CVE-2026-20957).
• Word: Out-of-bounds read vulnerabilities (CVE-2026-20944).

Note: These Office exploits often rely on the Preview Pane. Disabling the Preview Pane in Outlook and Explorer can offer temporary mitigation until patches are deployed.

Important Admin Changes for 2026

Windows Server 2025 KB Identifiers

Starting with this update, Microsoft is changing how it labels updates for its newest server OS. Windows Server 2025 will now have its own unique KB identifiers, separate from Windows 11 versions.

• Why it matters: If you rely on automated scripts or manual catalog searches, ensure you are looking for the Server-specific KBs, or your deployments may fail.

Secure Boot Certificate Renewal

Microsoft is rolling out updates to address expiring Secure Boot certificates. This is a phased rollout to prevent boot failures.

• The Plan: Devices will receive new certificates only after they demonstrate "sufficient successful update signals."
• Pro Tip: Do not force these updates manually unless necessary; let the automated servicing stack handle the prerequisite checks to avoid bricking bootloaders.

January 2026 sets a serious tone for the year. With over 100 fixes and active exploitation in the wild, "wait and see" is not a viable strategy this month.

Your Action Plan:

1. Prioritize: Patch workstations and servers for the Agere Modem and WinSqlite zero-days immediately.
2. Test: Validate the LSASS patches in a staging environment, as authentication fixes can sometimes cause friction with legacy apps.
3. Deploy: Roll out Office updates to protect users from malicious file attachments.

Official Microsoft Documentation

• Security Update Guide (Searchable Database): https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/
• KB5073724 (Windows 10 Extended Security Update https://support.microsoft.com/help/5073724
• KB5074109 (Windows 11 Cumulative Update): https://support.microsoft.com/help/5074109
• Windows Message Center (Release Health): https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/release-health/windows-message-center

Stay vigilant and happy patching!

If you’ve been following the industry chatter today, you know the narrative has shifted. For years, we (especially those of us with a CISSP/CCSP background) have treated Identity as the "new perimeter." But a new report from SC Media suggests that even this perimeter is dissolving.

The consensus for 2026 is clear: Identity is the battlefield, but the rules of engagement have changed. Attackers are no longer just breaking into networks; they are logging in. And they are using AI to do it with a level of sophistication that erases the "trust signals" we’ve relied on for decades.

Here is my breakdown of the key takeaways from the SC Media feature and what it means for cloud security professionals.

The "Trust Signal" is Dead

We used to tell users to "look for the typo." We trained them to spot awkward phrasing or slight mismatches in email domains. That advice is now obsolete.

With the maturity of AI-driven phishing and deepfakes, the "human" tells are gone. AI agents can now generate perfectly grammatical, context-aware lures that are indistinguishable from legitimate communications.

• The Threat: Real-time impersonation. It’s not just a fake email anymore; it’s a deepfake video call from your "CEO" or a realistic voice clone authorizing a wire transfer.
• The Reality: If your defense strategy relies on users "spotting" the phish, you have already lost.

The Explosion of Non-Human Identities (NHIs)

As cloud architects, we know that for every human user, there are dozens of service accounts, API keys, and bots. In 2026, this "non-human" population is exploding due to Agentic AI.

• The Problem: AI agents (like those connected via MCP) need permissions to act. They need to read files, access databases, and trigger workflows.
• The Risk: These agents effectively become high-speed, autonomous users. When they are compromised (or "hallucinate" into unauthorized actions), they don't just leak data—they execute actions at machine speed.

The "MCP" Trap

The article highlights a critical technical gap regarding the Model Context Protocol (MCP). While MCP is fantastic for interoperability (making it the "USB-C of AI"), it was not built with security as a primary primitive.

• Nancy Wang (1Password) puts it bluntly: "MCP is not a security standard. It was designed for interoperability... Once an agent connects, it's effectively operating with the same access as the user who configured it."
• CarlsCloud Take: This is the new "Over-Privileged Service Account." If you are deploying MCP-connected agents in your enterprise, you are effectively creating a new attack surface that bypasses traditional IAM governance.

What We Need to Do (The Fix)

The "Castle-and-Moat" is gone. We need to move to an Identity-First posture that assumes the user might be an AI imposter.

1. Kill the Password: It is time to aggressively adopt Passkeys and FIDO2. Phishing-resistant auth is no longer "nice to have"; it is the baseline.
2. Verify Behavior, Not Just Creds: Since valid credentials can be stolen or simulated, we need "invisible authentication"—systems that continuously verify who is behind the keyboard based on behavioral biometrics and context, not just the initial login.
3. Secure the Non-Humans: Treat AI agents like privileged users. Apply strict Least Privilege (PoLP) and short-lived tokens to any MCP connection.

🔗 Further Reading

To dig deeper into these concepts, check out these sources:

• Identity Becomes the 2026 Battleground (SC Media) - The original feature article analyzing the 2026 identity crisis.
• NIST SP 800-63-4 Digital Identity Guidelines (NIST) - The authoritative standard on identity proofing and federation, recently updated to address modern threats.
• Plug, Play, and Prey: Security Risks of MCP (Microsoft) - A technical deep dive into how attackers exploit the Model Context Protocol.

Securing MCP Servers: What You Need to Know - AI Explainer Series

A maximum-severity vulnerability has been disclosed in the React Server Components. This flaw allows an unauthenticated attacker to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) via malicious HTTP requests targeting Server Function endpoints. The issue stems from improper deserialization of payloads.

"An unauthenticated attacker could craft a malicious HTTP request to any Server Function endpoint that, when deserialized by React, achieves remote code execution on the server," the security alert warned. "Further details of the vulnerability will be provided after the rollout of the fix is complete."

Vulnerability Data

• Primary CVE: CVE-2025-55182 (React)
• Secondary CVE: CVE-2025-66478 (Next.js)
• Severity: Critical (CVSS 10.0)
• Status: Patched / Exploitation Imminent

Affected Software & Versions

The following React versions are vulnerable:

• 19.0
• 19.1.0
• 19.1.1
• 19.2.0

The bug affects versions 19.0, 19.1.0, 19.1.1, and 19.2.0 of:

• react-server-dom-webpack
• react-server-dom-parcel
• React-server-dom-turbopack

Note: This also impacts default configurations of Next.js, React Router, Waku, and others.

Resolution

Development teams must upgrade react-server-dom-webpack, react-server-dom-parcel, or react-server-dom-turbopack to the following safe versions immediately:

• 19.0.1
• 19.1.2
• 19.2.1

Threat Intelligence

While no active in-the-wild exploitation was confirmed at the time of disclosure, security firms (Wiz, WatchTowr, Rapid7) indicate that the barrier to entry for attackers is low. The exploit is high-fidelity, and automated scanning for vulnerable instances is expected to begin shortly.

Author - Dan Houser, ISSAP, ISSMP, CISSP, CCSP, CSSLP, CC

Colleagues and friends,

I continue to be proud of the work ISC2 delivers as a global voice on behalf of its members, and this 2025 ISC2 Cybersecurity Hiring Trends Report spotlights how vital cybersecurity certifications continue to be. I am also immensely thankful for the opportunity to provide a few thoughts regarding this important work.

I’m encouraged that three quarters of respondents are investing in their employees via training, vital to keeping pace with emerging challenges. I am also heartened at the strong showing for apprenticeships and internships as a path for security talent, which I have personally found rewarding and effective. Further, the report highlights the importance of broadening hiring outside traditional STEM/CompSci backgrounds and leveraging psychology, communications, business and internal roles outside IT. Some of my best hires and managers came from retail, restaurants and construction management, highlighting (as this report shows) the increasing relevance of soft skills to effective cybersecurity candidates.

We also have some work to do, based on these results, to continue to educate the marketplace and create realistic and balanced job descriptions. Certified in Cybersecurity (CC) has a strong presence in the marketplace in only its third year. However, over a third of hiring managers wanted to see advanced certifications (CISSP, CISA, CISM) and unlikely or unfeasible skills in entry and junior-level hires. This has been a problem for some time and it seems the battle continues.

My organization had a downsizing, one of many consulting firms that were challenged over the past few quarters. I found my role made redundant just before the 2024 holidays along with several others in my firm, enduring a typical unemployment period seeking my next great adventure. Reporting from the front lines, the hiring environment has dramatically changed and not for the better. In talking with recruiters in many key cybersecurity economies, staffing is becoming increasingly challenging as recruiters are slammed with AI-polished resumes delivered via automation, many times seeing more than 1,000 applications in the first day of a job posting. With so much noise, how do we ensure true professionals are finding roles? The answer is the same that caused ISC2 to be founded 35 years ago - certification.

As this report shows, certification continues to deliver differentiation in the marketplace, outpacing education and nearly on par with experience. Certification has never been more crucial to ensure there is clear qualification of cybersecurity professionals, enabling those holding CCSP, CISSP, ISSAP, CSSLP and other ISC2 credentials to stand out in a crowded and increasingly automated field. Never has certification accreditation, such as ANSI ISO/IEC 17024, been so important to cybersecurity, to ensure that those credentials matter and can be relied on by hiring managers and recruiters as independent verification of competency to a benchmark standard.

I encourage you to read this report and see how your opinions and practices may change. I found some surprises that I know will change my hiring perspectives going forward. The future is bright, even if the path continues to not be easy, as our profession continues to grow and learn in unexpected ways. I hope to see you at the 2025 ISC2 Security Congress for one of those great ways we can grow together!

Warmest Regards,

Dan Houser, ISSAP, ISSMP, CISSP, CCSP, CSSLP, CC

2025 Cybersecurity Hiring Trends:

Why Investing in Entry- and Junior-Level Talent is Key to Building a More Resilient Cybersecurity Workforce

As a profession, cybersecurity has enjoyed a long period of high personnel demand in the face of restricted supply. However, ISC2 research has shown that the economic and geopolitical factors that have weighed on other parts of organizations in recent years are now impacting cybersecurity teams and departments to the same degree. Cybersecurity professionals and hiring managers charged with recruiting and retaining staff for these critical roles are now dealing with unprecedented budgetary pressures that make building and retaining resilient teams even more challenging.

Nonetheless, cybersecurity remains an essential, in-demand and well-rewarded career path, offering both vast opportunities and complex challenges for hiring managers who are competing for top talent from a limited pool of candidates. The current climate has also put entry- and junior-level personnel and candidates in the spotlight, with the need to maintain and progress cybersecurity professionals through cybersecurity teams remaining a key consideration for hiring managers, as well as ensuring that job descriptions for early-career roles are realistic and achievable.

Success also relies on investing in and retaining the right people at every level as well as every part of the organization. To understand how cybersecurity hiring managers are finding success investing in entry- and junior-level roles, ISC2 surveyed 929 hiring managers across organizations of all sizes in Canada, Germany, India, Japan, the U.K. and the U.S.— six countries identified as having established or growing cybersecurity staffing needs. All respondents had entry- and junior-level cybersecurity personnel on staff and recruited for such roles in the two years prior to the survey taking place.

Key Findings

The following key findings highlight the main opportunities and challenges hiring managers face when building entry- and junior-level cybersecurity teams:

1. When it comes to hiring entry- and junior-level cybersecurity professionals, security managers prioritize hands-on experience and certifications over relevant education. In fact, most would consider candidates with only previous IT work experience (90%), or those who only hold an entry-level cybersecurity certification (89%), over those with only education in IT, cybersecurity or computer science, suggesting that relevant experience and certifications can often outweigh a degree alone when competing for cybersecurity roles.
2. Internships (55%) and apprenticeships (46%) are considered powerful tools for identifying and recruiting early-career cybersecurity talent. While standard job postings and staffing/recruiting firms remain top sources for identifying or recruiting entry- and junior-level hires (tied at 57%), sectors such as education, healthcare, government, IT services, and telecommunications are turning to internships just as often—or even more. This shift is especially pronounced in India, the U.K. and the U.S. Meanwhile, hiring managers in energy and utilities are increasingly relying on apprenticeships to fill critical roles.
3. While nearly 3 in 5 cybersecurity hiring managers (58%) said they are concerned about attrition among entry- and junior-level team members, most said they have both the budget to invest in their professional development (75%) and to adequately staff their team (73%). The research affirmed that training entry- and junior-level talent is not only fast but also cost-effective, making it a strategic investment with a high potential return.
4. About a quarter of cybersecurity hiring managers that recruit from education programs (55% of participants) have identified entry- and junior-level cybersecurity talent from programs outside of computer science, IT, or cybersecurity, highlighting an opportunity to broaden the talent pool by considering candidates from both IT and non-IT academic backgrounds who may bring fresh perspectives to the field.
5. Indicators point to cybersecurity hiring managers valuing non-technical skills as much as, or in some cases, more than, technical skills. The ability to work in a team, problem-solving and analytical thinking rank highest, ahead of data security and cloud security. This signals that hiring managers are not necessarily prioritizing technical know-how; they are looking for collaborative, adaptable thinkers who can tackle the complex problems impacting the cybersecurity landscape.
6. There is a recurring disconnect between the skills and credentials that security managers expect from entry- and junior-level cybersecurity professionals versus what this group can realistically achieve at this stage in their career. Take cloud security, for example—the top technical concept that security managers said entry- and junior-level candidates should be familiar with. Despite viewing it as an important concept to understand, only 18% of managers believe cloud security tasks could be handled by an entry-level professional, while 46% said junior-level expertise was required.

Despite the positive hiring plans stated by respondents at the time this study was conducted in December 2024 (75% of hiring managers had planned to hire more cybersecurity professionals during 2025, while nearly 90% had open positions at their organization), the cybersecurity profession (like many others right now) is still experiencing economic pressure that has arguably increased in recent months.

What’s more, simply hiring more employees is not a guaranteed fix for skills shortages within cybersecurity teams. Organizations should consider a more holistic approach—examining not just their recruitment and hiring strategies, but also what drives employee retention. Hiring an external candidate can be a significant expense, with the average cost per hire in the U.S. at nearly $5,000, so the importance and value of retention during a period of economic pressure increases.

By analyzing the stages of the employee lifecycle and developing or even reframing recruitment and retention strategies, organizations can uncover staffing opportunities and focus their efforts on securing the best talent.

One key consideration is the role of entry- and junior-level talent in filling cybersecurity vacancies. As seen in ISC2’s previous hiring manager and cybersecurity professional research, respondents indicated that many security managers (and perhaps organizations) are still setting unrealistic expectations and using unachievable job descriptions for early-career cybersecurity professionals. This is occurring even though many of the most pressing skills gaps can be filled by this group with the right training, support and realistic role parameters.

Hiring managers can effectively target this critical group, whether by refining job descriptions, providing clear development trajectories, or offering structured training and mentorships. Hiring strategies that include sourcing candidates from alternative pathways—such as internships, apprenticeships, and non-traditional educational or training backgrounds —can also help strengthen talent pipelines and foster a new generation of cybersecurity professionals from which hiring managers can draw. It is more important than ever for organizations to have these tools in place to stay ahead in a profession that demands continuous learning and adaptation.

"[Entry- and junior-level cybersecurity professionals] are an indispensable presence for our company as they are the people who will be in charge of the company in the future."

Cybersecurity hiring manager based in Japan

Echoing the findings from the 2022 ISC2 Cybersecurity Hiring Managers Guide, staffing/recruitment organizations and standard job postings remain the top sources for identifying or recruiting entry- and junior-level cybersecurity candidates. However, this year’s findings highlight the importance of internship and apprenticeship programs in sourcing early-career cybersecurity talent, which ranked among the top five sources. In certain industries and countries, internships and apprenticeships are used just as much, if not more, to source early-career cybersecurity talent. For instance, industries such as education, healthcare, government, IT services and telecommunications are using internships more frequently than other industries to identify candidates. Regionally, this trend is also evident in India, the U.K. and the U.S. Meanwhile, in sectors like energy and utilities, cybersecurity hiring managers are increasingly relying on apprenticeships to fill critical roles.

The fourth most cited method for identifying cybersecurity talent is through colleges and universities. Among cybersecurity hiring managers who recruit from this source, the majority find entry- and junior-level candidates from relevant undergraduate (80%), graduate (80%) and associate (72%) programs—with degrees in IT, computer science or cybersecurity.

However, a clear trend has emerged: Some cybersecurity hiring managers are looking beyond traditional academic and professional backgrounds when needing to fill entry- and junior-level cybersecurity roles. Nearly a quarter of those who recruit from colleges and universities said they had identified candidates from courses and backgrounds not directly related to cybersecurity or computer science (27% from undergraduate degree programs, 20% from graduate programs). This trend was mirrored inside organizations as well. Among the 22% of hiring managers who sourced cybersecurity talent from other departments within their organizations, most recruited from IT (85%) and technical support/help desk (68%). However, they also found candidates from their finance (39%), HR (38%), communications (37%), customer service (35%) and marketing (31%) teams.

This trend indicates the value that professionals from non-IT backgrounds can bring to the field, offering fresh perspectives, business acumen, technical and non-technical (soft) skills, and innovative thinking to the cybersecurity team.

Developing the Hiring Process

Several important steps in the hiring process help organizations attract top cybersecurity talent, including writing job descriptions, screening applications and assessing potential candidates. But who oversees these processes and why does it matter?

Job Descriptions

A job description is often a candidate’s first impression of an organization. It’s more than just a list of requirements; it also serves as a reflection of the company and should accurately depict what the role entails, as well as be realistically targeted. A job description requiring an experience-heavy candidate for an entry-level role would be an unrealistic outcome, prolonging the hiring process and significantly reducing the chances of a successful hire. Our findings reveal that IT and cybersecurity hiring managers typically take the lead in defining most requirements, such as technical skills, educational background, certifications, professional experience, security clearances and keywords for applicant tracking systems. The one exception? Non-technical skills and personality attributes, which are more often shaped by HR.

Screening Applications

For entry- and junior-level positions, application screening is most commonly a shared responsibility between IT/cybersecurity hiring managers and HR (53%). In other cases, it is handled exclusively by IT/cybersecurity hiring managers (35%) or solely by HR and software tools (13%).

This division of responsibility indicated by respondents mirrors the process of writing job descriptions, ensuring that both technical and non-technical qualifications are carefully considered during the screening stage.

Advice for Job Seekers

• Be prepared to demonstrate your knowledge in action, not just on paper. According to the study respondents, most organizations (84%) use skills-based assessments and/or tests for entry- and junior-level cybersecurity applicants.
• Your online presence matters more than you might think. Over half of hiring managers (54%) say they have passed on candidates due to their social media activity.

The Role of Certifications

When recruiting entry- and junior-level cybersecurity professionals, hiring managers prioritize hands-on experience and certifications over relevant education. In fact, most respondents (90%) stated they would consider candidates with only previous IT work experience, or those who only hold an entry-level cybersecurity certification (89%), suggesting that relevant experience and certifications that validate foundational competence carry additional weight in the hiring decision-making process, potentially outweighing a degree alone when competing for cybersecurity roles.

Additionally, when assessing the importance of previous IT experience, IT/cybersecurity certifications and relevant education, nearly all security managers considered these attributes as either critical or nice to have. However, when prioritizing only the critical attributes, IT/cybersecurity certifications (47%) ranked slightly higher than IT experience (44%) and relevant education (43%).

So, which certifications hold the most weight? While most cybersecurity certifications are seen as "nice to have" rather than required, there are key exceptions. For entry- and junior-level professionals, three foundational certifications lead the professional certification requirement from hiring managers across both groups of early-career professionals: Certified in Cybersecurity (CC) introduced by ISC2 in late 2022, along with CASP+ and Security+ from CompTIA.

A closer look at the top certifications required for entry- and junior–level positions revealed a notable misalignment between employer expectations and feasibility. A point aligned with the need for realistic job description requirements, the findings revealed that a significant proportion of hiring managers are still specifying industry qualifications that are unfeasible for these roles.

Many of the top certifications required for professionals seeking entry- and junior-level positions are intended to support more experienced cybersecurity professionals. For example, 38% of hiring managers said they require the CISA (ISACA) certification for entry-level positions, even though this certification demands a minimum of five years of professional experience in information systems auditing, control, assurance or security. Likewise, hiring managers expect around a third of entry- (34%) and junior-level (33%) candidates to have the CISSP (ISC2) certification, which also requires a minimum of five years of cumulative, paid experience in cybersecurity.

"This gap in what security managers require from early-career talent versus what these groups can realistically achieve creates a significant barrier to entry, which could potentially discourage otherwise qualified and capable candidates from applying for foundational cybersecurity roles."

Top Sought-After Skills for Entry- and Junior-Level Roles

Indicators point to cybersecurity hiring managers valuing non-technical skills as much as, or in some cases, more than, technical skills. In fact, three of the top five skills that hiring managers indicate they value most – teamwork, problem-solving and analytical thinking – aren’t technical at all.

With these three attributes ranking ahead of data security and cloud security skills, we see a clear requirement for a blend of both technical and non-technical fundamental competencies. This signals that hiring managers are looking for collaborative, adaptable thinkers who can tackle complex problems in the cybersecurity landscape, rather than just technology specialists.

Here is the breakdown across technical, non-technical and personality attributes:

Navigating Skill Expectations for Entry-Level Roles

When asked what they would say to those who believe there are no true entry-level roles in cybersecurity, cybersecurity hiring managers consistently highlighted the value these candidates bring. They pointed to fresh perspectives, the ability to take on foundational tasks like malware analysis and penetration testing and the capacity to relieve senior team members of routine responsibilities.

Our research also revealed the tasks most likely to be assigned by experience level:

To truly practice what they preach, organizations should clearly define entry-level roles, perhaps also differentiating between “desired qualifications” and “required qualifications” in job descriptions. Early on, they can also communicate professional development opportunities and map career growth for these candidates. This will serve a dual purpose by empowering cybersecurity candidates to apply for roles with more confidence and helping prospective and current employees envision their long-term potential within the company.

"Cybersecurity is a constantly evolving field, with new threats and technologies emerging all the time. Career starters generally have a greater ability to learn and adapt."

Cybersecurity hiring manager based in Germany

"Entry-level candidates can assist in conducting risk assessments and creating risk profiles, helping to identify and mitigate potential threats before they become serious issues."

Cybersecurity hiring manager based in the U.S.

"There are many roles in cybersecurity for entry-level professionals. As a former CTO and current CEO, I can assure you that the main in-house cybersecurity projects are handled by interns or first-year cybersecurity interns."

Cybersecurity hiring manager based in India

Professional Development and Retention

Most cybersecurity hiring managers reported having both the budget to invest in entry- and junior-level workers’ professional development (75%) and to adequately staff their teams (73%) at the time this survey was fielded. Nearly 60% expressed concern about employee attrition. If resources are available, where does this concern stem from? Beyond certain job features like salary/wages and total rewards, the overall employee experience plays a critical role in employee retention, particularly professional development opportunities. A study of early-career professionals found that while about one-third (32%) of recent graduates intend to stay in their current job for four or more years, nearly twice as many—almost two-thirds (65%)—would stay for the same amount of time given consistent opportunities to develop in-demand skills.

"Our entry-level and junior cybersecurity team members bring fresh perspective, technical expertise and enthusiasm to our organization, enhancing our overall capabilities. By investing in their growth and development, we're cultivating future leaders who will help drive our organization's success."

Cybersecurity hiring manager based in the U.K.

Most organizations, based on participant feedback, are on the right track—91% of hiring managers who responded said they provide professional development opportunities for entry- and junior-level cybersecurity professionals during work hours. In some cases, engaging entry- and junior-level talent may be as simple as communicating these opportunities and providing concrete examples of how they can take advantage of them.

The top professional development offerings that organizations provide to entry- and junior-level cybersecurity professionals include certification training/courses (65%), training/courses for non-certification skills/knowledge (59%), career pathing and advancement (57%) and mentorship programs (informal and formal) (50%). Notably, when hiring managers were asked about the most effective ways to train entry- and junior-level cybersecurity professionals, their responses mostly aligned with these existing offerings.

Despite mentorships being cited as one of the most effective ways to train early-career talent, half of organizations do not provide this option. The primary reasons for this are that organizations have other methods (37%), there’s a lack of staff who can or are willing to be mentors (36%) and a lack of time/security team is too busy (32%).

Our research reveals that early-career cybersecurity roles are relatively quick to fill. Twenty-one percent of hiring managers say entry-level cybersecurity roles are typically filled in under a month, with another 40% reporting it typically takes just 1–3 months. For junior-level roles, 8% say these positions can be filled in less than a month and 34% within 1–3 months. These timelines stand in contrast to more senior roles, which often take longer to fill.

Once hired, training this group can be fast and cost-effective, too. Most hiring managers reported that training entry- (81%) and junior-level (79%) professionals to handle tasks independently takes less than a year. However, the training timeline varies slightly between these groups. For example, hiring managers are more likely to say that junior-level cybersecurity professionals require less time in the early stages, with 17% stating they can be trained in 1-3 months, compared to 8% for entry-level professionals. The majority of hiring managers surveyed (56%) said that training entry-level cybersecurity professionals typically takes 4–9 months, while 45% said the same for junior-level professionals.

When examining training costs, hiring managers commonly registered spending between U.S. $1,000 and $4,999 to train entry- (45%) and junior-level (38%) cybersecurity professionals to handle tasks independently. However, nearly a third (31%) indicate that training an entry-level professional costs less than $1,000, while a quarter (25%) report the same for junior-level professionals.

Conclusion

The findings of this study provide a clear view of the current cybersecurity hiring landscape, highlighting key challenges and opportunities for all hiring managers. Demand for key skills in the cybersecurity profession remains high. While most organizations had open positions and planned to hire more professionals in the year ahead when this survey took place, it’s critical to regularly reassess current recruitment, hiring and retention strategies to ensure they are viable and actionable and aligned with the current conditions the organization is operating within.

"Our juniors are our rising stars. If I had half a dozen more juniors of the caliber we have now, we would not have ANY security concerns going into the 2040s even."

Cybersecurity hiring manager based in Canada

This doesn’t mean starting from scratch—it means refining current process and thinking outside the box on how to attract top talent. Hiring managers should consider the following:

• Address the disconnect between employer expectations and entry- and junior-level realities. Our research shows that job descriptions for entry- and junior-level cybersecurity talent list requirements that are often difficult or impossible for these professionals to meet. This can create a catch-22—where employers struggle to find qualified candidates and early-career talent is locked out of opportunities that could help them build that very experience. Hiring managers should consider reevaluating their job descriptions and other hiring mechanisms to reflect the true nature of the role, making the distinction between “nice-to-have” and “must-have” qualifications clear.
• Embrace alternative pathways into the cybersecurity profession – hire for attitude, train for aptitude. As a relatively new and evolving field, cybersecurity requires a dynamic approach to talent acquisition. Traditional pipelines, such as relevant educational backgrounds and prior IT experience, remain valuable, but they are not the only routes to success in the cybersecurity profession. Hiring cybersecurity professionals from a broad spectrum of educational and professional backgrounds is an effective strategy to address shortages in candidates without compromising on standards. In fact, blending technical expertise with non-technical skills or personality attributes such as teamwork, problem-solving skills, analytical thinking, etc., can strengthen cybersecurity teams and bring fresh perspectives to the field.
• Leverage foundational certifications to identify high-potential talent. While some experience-based certifications are incompatible with early-career cybersecurity roles, foundational certifications provide an achievable and independent means to verify the competency of an entry- or junior-level candidate. These globally-recognized and reproducible baseline measures of knowledge and capability offer hiring managers a valuable tool to differentiate and evaluate these candidates.

The research shows that many security managers have already begun tapping into “non-traditional” talent pools and embracing non-technical, non-IT and foundational certified candidates. However, there is room to expand these efforts further, leveraging transferable skills from other industries to build a more sustainable and resilient cybersecurity workforce.

About ISC2 & Methodology

Survey Methodology

We surveyed a total of 929 cybersecurity hiring managers from Canada (158), Germany (155), India (152), Japan (154), the U.K. (155) and the U.S. (155) in December of 2024. Respondents were surveyed in their native or local languages. To be eligible to participate, managers had to have entry- or junior-level cybersecurity professionals on their teams. Most (94%) had hired entry- and junior-level professionals in the past two years. The margin of error for the global descriptive statistics in this research is +/- 3% at a 95% confidence level.

Did you enjoy CarlsCloud™ today and did I help you at all?

If so, buy me a coffee or just shoot me a note via LinkedIn to say thanks it would mean a lot!

Took the CCSP exam and passed on the 1st attempt!  Glad to get it done for sure and hoping to pay knowledge forward to help others out on their certification journey.

If you have not read other articles on my site...  I'm a current CISSP holder and passed the CISSP exam in mid 2023.  The knowledge/study efforts from that definitely helped with the carryover subject matter for this exam...although obvious differences in focus toward cloud specific security/domain areas.

I studied for ~2 months off and on at beginning of this year January 2025 and hard this past March 2025 and used the primary resources:

Pocket Prep CCSP

Paid for a month subscription to get the 1,000 bank of questions which I worked through to understand weak areas. The references to the CBK and OSG and other external cloudsec reference doc material for each question was definitely helpful imo to research and further understand weak subject areas further. The quick quiz features and missed questions/custom exam quiz functionality of app was useful.

Learnzapp official ISC2 CCSP app

Paid for a month of questions, but honestly some questions seem dated and not as /updated relevant as the Pocket Prep CCSP. Although I did take 7 of the 8 practice exams and was scoring in the 75-85% range on them so practice exams for those were useful for confidence reinforcement etc.

CCSP ISC2 Official Study Guide - 3rd edition

Kindle format - The book was a good foundation for overall knowledge and what to expect from exam. As with CISSP exam I used the OSG with CCSP. It definitely helped with overall exam expectations and focus...although of course at times very dry.

Pete Zerger, CCSP Exam Cram on YouTube

Just like with the CISSP exam prep content he has produced and helped so many...you can't go wrong here either. A tremendous resource that is 100% free. I'd argue some could likely pass with just his YT video prep material, but obviously I'd suggest using multiple resources.

Mike Chapple’s Last Minute CCSP Review

I did end up grabbing this in the last week to prep. Honestly probably could have gone without it, but does reinforce a lot of important exam focused content in a 17 page concise document.

Alukos CCSP Resources

Very good indexed resource for complete mapped  CCSP exam topics to the 6 domains.  

Happy to answer any questions and again good luck!!!

PS - Also highly recommend the CCSP subreddit for information on the CCSP exam and resources others have found helpful.

My CCSP exam thoughts post on Reddit /CCSP

Did you enjoy CarlsCloud™ today and did I help you at all?

If so, buy me a coffee or just shoot me a note via LinkedIn to say thanks it would mean a lot!